Friday, September 18, 2009

Profiles in Domestic Genocide: The Cost of Our Private Health System

If a recent Harvard study is to be believed, we are killing 45,000 of our fellow citizens every year for a lack of health insurance.

Study links 45,000 U.S. deaths to lack of insurance
Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:11pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nearly 45,000 people die in the United States each year -- one every 12 minutes -- in large part because they lack health insurance and can not get good care, Harvard Medical School researchers found in an analysis released on Thursday.

"We're losing more Americans every day because of inaction ... than drunk driving and homicide combined," Dr. David Himmelstein, a co-author of the study and an associate professor of medicine at Harvard, said in an interview with Reuters.

Overall, researchers said American adults age 64 and younger who lack health insurance have a 40 percent higher risk of death than those who have coverage.

The findings come amid a fierce debate over Democrats' efforts to reform the nation's $2.5 trillion U.S. healthcare industry by expanding coverage and reducing healthcare costs.

President Barack Obama's has made the overhaul a top domestic policy priority, but his plan has been besieged by critics and slowed by intense political battles in Congress, with the insurance and healthcare industries fighting some parts of the plan.

The Harvard study, funded by a federal research grant, was published in the online edition of the American Journal of Public Health. It was released by Physicians for a National Health Program, which favors government-backed or "single-payer" health insurance.

An similar study in 1993 found those without insurance had a 25 percent greater risk of death, according to the Harvard group. The Institute of Medicine later used that data in its 2002 estimate showing about 18,000 people a year died because they lacked coverage.

Part of the increased risk now is due to the growing ranks of the uninsured, Himmelstein said. Roughly 46.3 million people in the United States lacked coverage in 2008, the U.S. Census Bureau reported last week, up from 45.7 million in 2007.

Another factor is that there are fewer places for the uninsured to get good care. Public hospitals and clinics are shuttering or scaling back across the country in cities like New Orleans, Detroit and others, he said.

Study co-author Dr. Steffie Woolhandler said the findings show that without proper care, uninsured people are more likely to die from complications associated with preventable diseases such as diabetes and heart disease.

Some critics called the study flawed.

The National Center for Policy Analysis, a Washington think tank that backs a free-market approach to health care, said researchers overstated the death risk and did not track how long subjects were uninsured.

Woolhandler said that while Physicians for a National Health Program supports government-backed coverage, the Harvard study's six researchers closely followed the methodology used in the 1993 study conducted by researchers in the federal government as well as the University of Rochester in New York.

The Harvard researchers analyzed data on about 9,000 patients tracked by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics through the year 2000. They excluded older Americans because those aged 65 or older are covered by the U.S. Medicare insurance program.

"For any doctor ... it's completely a no-brainer that people who can't get health care are going to die more from the kinds of things that health care is supposed to prevent," said Woolhandler, a professor of medicine at Harvard and a primary care physician in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

(Editing by Xavier Briand)

That is the equivalent of 15 September 11s, the first one of which led to the right-wing-engineered elimination of our Fourth Amendment and increased federal law enforcement snooping of our entire population (including the cataloging of all our phone calls). And the money it cost for that? According to Congressman Mike Pence, you can never put a price on killing Muslims (aka, freedom).

Of course, if you ask Mr. Pence his view on spending some of that money so our people do not die, his response is quite different.

You see, they are killed by a system our free marketeers support, because the guardians of this very real health care death panel are either subsidized by its sponsors, or have enough disposable income so not to be harassed by the less fortunate who die so the Cato Institute's donors can keep their McMansions.

It is in this environment that we have the modern day Bourbon Democrats--basically, closet case Republicans, making sure the lumpens are kept at the mercy of the forces that murder by omission 45,000 of our people every year. The same Blue Dog gang, Max Baucus, Ben Nelson, Tom Carpenter, Ken Conrad, and Evan Bayh, all of these anti-universal health care folk voted in favor of taking $700 billion of our money and handing it over to Bear Sterns, AIG, and Citigroup (while saying little to nothing about the execs at AIG who gave themselves large payouts and bonuses at our expense). A trillion dollars for the people we kill or nearly a trillion who kill and rip us off for the god of free enterprise? I think we all know who the winners of that battle are. Such is the cost for those who do not have enough money to donate to Mr. Baucus's campaign fund.

I am sure if the Supreme Court decides to rule that corporations are humans with the First Amendment right to unfettered sponsorship of our elected prostitutes, the water carriers from the Blue Dog coalition will be there to tell us not to worry about the scrape marks on their knees and backs. After all, we would not want to see poor Max go without his servicing for those payoffs he receives from the 45,000-people-a-year-killers. Who knows, maybe one day we will even recognize those 45,000 dead as being as equal and worthy of human life as the companies.

No comments: